Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Fee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:13, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Fee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability. Fails GNG and WP:CREATIVE. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:38, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep There is enough on the web to improve the article, he seems to be well known in the comic world, it requires improvement not deleting. Govvy (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Great! But we need to see references that meet the criteria for establishing notability and to lend weight to your !vote. If you find a couple, please post them here. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 13:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing indicates he is a notable filmmaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nothing? Directing the blockbuster 2017 Cars 3 (which received significant coverage for the director) isn't notable? Subject is gaining notability status alone for going from an animator to a feature-film director. Further down this list you'll find a musician Cynthia Crane who seems to be "notable" for only simple WP:GNG and media mentions for night club reviews. WP is going to delete this and keep that? Come on. Where is the continuity of requirement guidelines? Maineartists (talk) 00:44, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - he apparently directed a film that made $378.9m dollars. I think that makes him a notable filmmaker. I've added two new sources. Blythwood (talk) 07:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The Collider.com reference is essentially a transcript of an interview and fails as a PRIMARY source. Similarly, the slashfilm.com reference is an interview and fails as a PRIMARY source. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:37, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. An interview by a reputable news organisation shows that the person is considered of interest to their readership. He clearly meets sections 3 and 4 of WP:ARTIST: he's the director of a significant work which has been widely reviewed. Blythwood (talk) 08:25, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:06, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In response to references not being PRIMARY sources: WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. Maineartists (talk) 16:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Director of Pixar's Cars 3. We're done. Carrite (talk) 06:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.